Sense and Avoid Sensor Selection
by
Stanley
D. Pebsworth
Embry-Riddle
Aeronautical University
May
2016
A Research Project Submitted to the
Worldwide Campus in partial fulfillment of the requirements for course UNSY 605,
Unmanned Systems Sensing, Perception, and Processing
Sense and Avoid Sensor Selection
In the area of Sense and Avoid (SAA) for small
unmanned aerial systems (sUAS) less than 55 pounds, there are few options to
consider. Many sUAS companies such as
DJI are producing their versions of SAA technology in the new Phantom 4 (Amato,
A., 2016). The DJI SAA system offers two
cameras that sense the area around the sUAS and determine if the sUAS will maneuver
around an object or stop and wait for operator input (Amato, A., 2016).
In
order for a system to properly SAA, you must first determine how to best develop
situational awareness (SA) of the environment around that particular system. SA is described as the data collection,
management, and dissemination that develops awareness of one’s surroundings
(Erwin, T., 2015). So why is it
important? Besides safety, SAA will be
required to fully integrate all UAS into the National Airspace System (NAS).
Mid
Air Collision Avoidance System (MIDCAS) is a European project that uses sensor
fusion to best tackle the job of SAA.
With the integration of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B)
transponders and electro-optical (EO) and Infrared (IR) sensors, MIDCAS has
been successfully flight tested in Italy relying on fusion of non-cooperative
sensors (European Defense Agency, 2015).
MIDCAS provides SA to UAS pilots, traffic avoidance or self-separation,
and collision avoidance (Pellebergs, J., 2010).
The
technology that will make sUAS safe for our civilian skies will be a
combination of integrated systems that provide the best SA to the
operator. The fusion of ADS-B and EO/IR
sensors is the best current solution.
ADS-B systems have been developed that weigh approximately 3.5 ounces
and EO/IR sensors have been developed that weight approximately 18 ounces (GCN.com,
2013) (Zarandy, A., Zsedrovits, T., Nagy, Z., Kiss,
A., & Roska, T., 2012). This light weight means that integration into
sUAS weighing less than 55 pounds is feasible.
The MIDAS project developers plan to keep their design well contained as
UAS systems come in all shapes and sizes from Global Hawk to ones that fit into
your palm (GCN.com, 2013).
The
real challenge is not the systems but regulatory issues. Once SAA requirements are well defined by the
FAA, systems can be designed that meet regulatory demands. It is a difficult concept to grasp and one
that is even harder given no boundaries or regulation to stay within. Further research should be done that
addresses the full spectrum of aviation for SAA and not just UAS. The capabilities of electronically assisted
SAA could prove beneficial to both manned and unmanned aircraft.
References
Amato,
A. (2016). Why the DJI Phantom 4 may be
the drone you are looking for. Retrieved from http://dronelife.com/2016/03/02/why-the-dji-phantom-4-may-be-the-drone-you-are-looking-for/
Erwin,
T. (2015). Sense and avoid. Retrieved from http://www.harrisgeospatial.com/Company
/PressRoom/Blogs/ImagerySpeaksDetail/TabId/901/ArtMID/2927/ArticleID/14506/Sense-and-Avoid.aspx
European
Defense Agency. (2015). MIDCAS
demonstrates progress for RPAS integration into civil airspace. Retrieved
from https://www.eda.europa.eu/info-hub/press-centre/latest-news/2015/04/30/midcas-demonstrates-progress-for-rpas-integration-into-civil-airspace
GCN.com.
(2013). The tech that will make drones safe for civilian skies. Retrieved from https://gcn.com/Articles/2013/07/12/Drone-UAV-sense-and-avoid-technologies-civilian-airspace.aspx?Page=2
Pellebergs,
J. (2010). The MIDCAS project. Retrieved
from http://www.icas.org/ICAS_ ARCHIVE/ICAS2010/PAPERS/821.PDF
Zarandy,
A., Zsedrovits, T., Nagy, Z., Kiss, A., & Roska, T. (2012). Visual sense-and-avoid system for UAVs.
Paper presented at the 1-5. doi:10.1109/CNNA.2012.6331447
Very Interesting to see how ADS-B could be used for more than traffic avoidance and system guidance. I believe NASA is already working on a similar system for UAS under 500ft for monitoring and de-confliction.
ReplyDelete